Brian Gongol

South Korean president says he's not really worried about North Korea's recent missile tests because the missiles couldn't reach the US but were too long-range to hit his own country. Now that's some strange rationalization.

In their case, it's worship of Mao. But naturally, that presents a complication, since hero worship is a lot like religion, and a Communist state just can't handle that.


Kurt Eichenwald has done several investigations into the exploitation of children, and he seems to have a level head about when it's appropriate to break out the moral compass and take action. A scary related thought: It's doubtful that the law has kept pace with the rapidly-improving quality of vector graphics, which allows people to create completely computer-generated images of things like other people that are impossible to distinguish from the real thing. The implications for the clear public role for protecting children from exploitation could be very serious: Does one modification to a real photo make it less exploitative? Would a computer-generated image bearing a strong likeness to a real child qualify as exploitation of that child? These are extremely important questions, but Congress is busy talking about horse meat.

True, painful, and truer still


The habit of paying down mortgages prematurely could be costing a lot of people big bucks in the long run, since they could instead be shoveling more money into tax-advantaged retirement savings accounts


Foreign news agencies will be forced to get government approval and to distribute their information through the state-run Xinhua news agency. Thanks to technology, this kind of rule will grow ever more difficult to enforce -- though it's a sign that the Communist government is becoming concerned about the erosion of its authority.

It's a lot like the FCC's current "Obscenity fines are huge, but we won't tell you what's obscene or not" policy for broadcasters -- by refusing to lay out a clear set of standards in law for exactly what's legal and exactly what's not, the government is exposing CIA agents to needless liability. Quite naturally, a private market to insure them against the liability has emerged -- but it would be a lot simpler (at least according to Ronald Coase) if the law would simply be clear from the beginning and save everyone involved the unnecessary anxiety. It's the undefinedness of the present situation which makes it so dicey.


