Brian Gongol
![News](http://gongol.com/assets/icons/2005icons/news.png)
Pretty much the same as the old boss?
![Computers and the Internet](http://gongol.com/assets/icons/2005icons/comp.png)
It's not really anything new -- it was noted here in 2007 that investment in renewable energy might be a strategic move for Google, and in 2008 that it was not necessarily an altruistic move at all. Which, by the way, isn't necessarily a bad thing. Companies have no obligation to be charitable. And Google's position is such that diversifying away from search results alone is a very wise move, especially since the day may come when the company finds itself regulated like the phone company used to be. It actually meets many of the qualifications for a "public utility" already. Curious, perhaps -- maybe even ironic -- that they might be able to make more money in the future from an economic sector that has traditionally been a regulated sector (energy) than from its currently unregulated Internet business.
![Threats and Hazards](http://gongol.com/assets/icons/2005icons/threats.png)
![Business and Finance](http://gongol.com/assets/icons/2005icons/biz.png)
They want to know whether the banks could handle a recession with 12% unemployment and a 5% decline in GDP
![Humor and Good News](http://gongol.com/assets/icons/2005icons/haha.png)
Drunk man in a suit seems not to realize he's going the wrong way on an escalator, despite the aid of really insistent passers-by